ellielol:

ellielol:

by the way i’m the reason why they send weathermen into hurricanes and shit. “it’s needless and dangerous!!!!!” i don’t care. every day i call into CNN and demand they send their most pathetic newscaster into a storm to watch them be knocked down by wave and wind and they sigh and say yes ma'am. and i do this all for nasty, sexual purposes, if you were wondering.

my favorite part of this post is people started tagging it with names of characters i’ve never heard of so i got curious and googled them and like a third are just tagging it as their local weatherman. very funny.

ato-dato:

Aziraphale please! He’s been through enough!!!

sanzundertale:

babygirl i will invent stages of grief you have never seen before

sonseulsoleil:

he can’t keep doing this to me!!!!!

vinnie-cha:

a pirate, a serial killer and a demon walk into a bar after a break up

—

Instagram | Twitter | Etsy | Shop | Ko-fi

hg-aneh:

Local Soho residents adopt heartbroken demon

theblurrinessofbeingalive:

Good Omens 2x6 // Fleabag 2x6

dasebeleren:

grimeclown:

grimeclown:

FAT TITTY TUESDAY HAS BEGUN YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO

Survive

twilightcitysky:

Everything Is Meant (long S2 analysis, part 3)

Part one

Part two

There’s SO MUCH excellent meta out there right now, and I’m going to try not to reinvent the wheel too much, but I want to keep going with tying the episodes/ elements up together because on first watch it wasn’t entirely clear how everything fit. I also strongly recommend a rewatch, no matter what you felt about the ending… if you need to stop it 10 minutes early, do that, but you pick up so much more the second time around.

So: Maggie and Nina. I spent most of my first watch wondering why we were bothering with them, honestly. Later in the season Nina, and then Maggie and Nina, gave Crowley some insightful advice, but their actual relationship didn’t progress despite all the meddling, and the amount of emotional investment BOTH Aziraphale and Crowley had in making them get together was frankly strange.

I started thinking in terms of mirror couples, since that was such a big deal in S1 and that’s clearly what they were set up to be, but I made the mistake that all of us made on first watch: that Nina was Crowley and Maggie was Aziraphale. It still wasn’t really coming together.

Then I put the psych hat back on and started to think about displacement. Displacement is a defense mechanism, and it consists of satisfying an impulse (usually an unconscious one) with a substitute object. At the beginning of the season, Aziraphale and Crowley aren’t really in a good place, and I think on some level they know that. Aziraphale is trying to SHOW Crowley that he wants to take the next step through all the casual touches and phone calls and inviting him in, and feeling frustrated because Crowley doesn’t seem to be taking the bait. (I absolutely think that Aziraphale tried to get Crowley to stay with him at the bookshop instead of living in his CAR, and Crowley said no. That’s a whole other meta.) Meanwhile, Crowley, I think, is waiting for a Grand Gesture. Where did he go, as soon as Aziraphale brought up trying to get two humans to fall in love? Romantic tropes. Getting caught in the rain under an awning. A dramatic kiss that opens someone’s eyes. That’s the sort of thing he’s always done, right? Big rescues, impassioned pleas on the street, fancy dinners, “give you a lift anywhere you want to go”. He’s defensive and guarded and unlikely to let someone in unless he’s CERTAIN he won’t be rejected, and Aziraphale’s approaches are just too… quiet. No one’s fault, they just don’t speak the same language.

Then, they’re handed the opportunity to make two humans fall in love, and they’re both All In immediately. Look at Crowley’s face when he summons the rainstorm. This is HUGE for him. Why? Because of displacement. Look at Aziraphale arranging the ball and being borderline deranged about it. They’re both desperate to demonstrate what they think it takes for two people to move past their misunderstandings and fall in love. They can’t do it for each other because the stakes are too high, and if either of them shows their cards unequivocally the vulnerability feels life-shattering. They’re codependent and terrified of rejection and also, importantly, have no idea what they’re doing when it comes to love. “Saw it in a film”, Crowley says. Aziraphale’s read about it in books. But they have zero practical experience.

Instead of learning to communicate, they try to say what they want to say through the medium of Maggie and Nina, up to and including the questionable moral decision to exert control over people’s actions and thoughts during the ball. If I can just make this come out right, they both think, then things between us will be alright too. It HAS to come out right. They’re attempting to gain some control over their own lives, over something that feels so overwhelming and shattering they can’t look directly at it.

It doesn’t come out right. Nina’s relationship falls apart, but that doesn’t mean she’s in love with Maggie. While Crowley’s stress-cleaning the bookshop to the music that played when Aziraphale got his books back in 1941 (just fuck me up David Arnold), they come in and tell him so. “I don’t understand”, says Crowley. Because it should have worked. Why didn’t it work?

They tell him, of course. “You need to talk to each other. Say what you’re really thinking.” But here’s the thing about communication: you have to learn it. You need to get the hang of expressing your feelings without blaming your partner, and separating intent from impact, and staying away from getting defensive and lashing out. No one has ever taught Aziraphale and Crowley how to do this. It’s like Maggie and Nina put Crowley in front of a loom and asked him to recreate the Bayeux Tapestry. He doesn’t have the skills; he’s always going to get it wrong, even if he tries his hardest.

And he does try. But that’s where Maggie and Nina the mirror couple, rather than Maggie and Nina the displacement relationship or Maggie and Nina the Greek chorus, come in. Aziraphale, as Nina, has just ended an incredibly toxic, invasive relationship with Heaven. A relationship that invaded every facet of his life, isolated him, and prevented him from being close to anyone else. “Rebound mess,” Nina says. Aziraphale is a rebound mess. He’s transferred the responsibility for his emotional wellness to Crowley. Crowley is the person he calls when he’s in trouble, or (and this is key) when he wants to report a clever/ good thing he’s done, or when he’s bored. (At no point did Crowley reference Aziraphale calling him for a solicitous reason– another problem.) Crowley is meant to take care of him. He forgets, I think, that Crowley is a person with his own wants and needs, just like Maggie and Nina are people with their own wants and needs who don’t appreciate being messed with. (I think things would have been much different had Aziraphale BEEN THERE for Maggie and Nina’s talk with Crowley, but he wasn’t.)

And Maggie-as-Crowley? Lonely. Behind on rent, at risk of being evicted (it’s important to note that Aziraphale saves Maggie from losing her record shop, as he couldn’t save Crowley from losing his flat). Pining. Awkward. Revolving around Nina like a planet, to the extent that we don’t get much of an impression of her otherwise. They realize, there at the end, that they both need to round themselves out before jumping into a relationship. Aziraphale and Crowley need that too. They need to take time apart and learn to be healthy on their own. Unfortunately they don’t have the skills to get to that conclusion in a healthy way, so it all explodes in their faces and everything falls apart.

Aziraphale tries to teach Nina and Maggie to dance as a substitute for communication. Nina and Maggie try to teach Crowley communication as a substitute for the dance they’ve been doing around each other. That’s the reason they’re a part of the plot: they exist to demonstrate the way Aziraphale and Crowley might have succeeded in forging a better dynamic. Sadly, the boys’ dance is too practiced and they got sucked right back into it.

It’s okay, I think, that Nina and Maggie’s storyline never really went anywhere. It wasn’t supposed to. It’s an allegory, not something that needs to stand alone.

twilightcitysky:

Everything Is Meant (long S2 analysis, part 2)

Part one here

Okay, so that’s how I think the pre-creation scene and Gabriel’s arc connect to Aziraphale’s choice. I also think the ineffable bureaucracy speedrun exists to prove totally different things to Aziraphale and Crowley: Aziraphale loves that they can love each other but notes they have to run away to be together; Crowley sees this and immediately thinks “hey, we can do that too!”, forgetting that running away is not a solution Aziraphale has ever been interested in. It’s the mentality of an individualist vs a group-oriented mind, and neither of them is necessarily wrong, it’s just that their priorities are different and they HAVE TO TALK ABOUT IT, which they don’t.

Continued analysis under the cut:

Keep reading

twilightcitysky:

Everything Is Meant (long S2 analysis, part 1)

I cannot figure out for the life of me how to make gifs so this will have to be a gif-less essay. If anyone more tech savvy than me wants to reblog with relevant media, please do!

I’ve seen a lot of people saying how Aziraphale’s actions in the final ten minutes come out of left field and are OOC, and when I first watched the episode I felt the same, but now I think I couldn’t have been more wrong. And I don’t think Aziraphale is being controlled… I think the entire season showed us exactly what was going to happen.

On first watch, what struck me was the number of plot points that seemed disconnected. I couldn’t figure out how Job related to the present, or the Victorian era, or the Nazi zombies (still at sea on the zombies part tbh). I didn’t know where the Maggie/ Nina subplot was going, or why we were bothering with it. Then I put my “psych hat” on and it was like seeing one of those 3D pictures come into focus. It’s a psychological networking rather than a plot-driven one, which is what Neil told us to expect.

Detailed analysis under the cut, with spoilers:

Keep reading

minart-was-taken:

So I have this headcanon about Larry…

tooies:

idlnmclean:

art-by-kaine-shields:

modmad:

theshitpostcalligrapher:

ceekari:

catgirltoes:

ceekari:

kalanchoeblossfeldiana:

kalanchoeblossfeldiana:

fun fact about me is that when i was a kid id write capital E’s with as many of those little horizontal lines as possible and id call them ladder E’s and adults fucking hated them

artistic rendition

All capital letters should have a leveled-up form

So far I’ve got

• ladder letters: A, E, F, H, T
• humpback B’s and P’s get as many bumps as you think they need
• circle O’s, you just keep spiraling in til you feel like you’ve made your point
• tree letters branch into smaller versions of themselves ad nauseum: X, Y
• spider Q’s, so many legs

Please add your own unsettling godtier capitals!

New alphabet dropped!

oh my god, it’s beautiful

(future handwritten notes are gonna be so wonderfully cursed now, thank you! :D )

well it’s going to take some getting used to, @ceekari (don’t mind the redacted letter between T and U)

But I think i’ve taken a real shine to it! 

recursive

So i may have done a thing in an insomnia fueled jaunt into insanity.

find an .otf of the font here

This is how new alphabets get invented.

uppest case

psych-is-the-name:

bilbobagginsomebabez:

beatrice-otter:

bilbobagginsomebabez:

genuinely friendly reminder to never EVER share someone’s location/information without their explicit permission. you do not know why that person is asking, what they plan to do with that information, or even if the asker has that person’s best interest in mind at all.

OP is also not exaggerating how common this is. my abusive parents successfully kidnapped me from work once because a coworker who didn’t know my situation told them when my next shift was. my parents didn’t even know where I lived at that point in time, which was very much on purpose. it took me days to get away again. ALWAYS tell the person that is being looked for that someone is looking. never share personal information or even how to get in contact them. you can take information in and pass it along, but you absolutely cannot give any out.

[image descriptions: screencap of tweets from rahaeli @rahaeli 7/9/21.

Hello friends, your regular reminder that a not insignificant number of social media “missing person” efforts are actually someone’s abuser trying to get them back, especially with missing older teens. Please don’t share unofficial missing person flyers–

–and if you do spot/know the person in them, tell THAT PERSON someone is looking for them instead of providing any information to the person doing the looking.

I cannot tell you how many times I have seen a site wide “missing person” turn into the person writing in to ask us to enforce the restraining order, or the custodial parent begging us to shut down the non custodial parent’s attempted kidnapping

Every time I say this, someone says “but what if it’s real, better safe than sorry” and no, it absolutely is not. For a good while I got “this is my abuser, please make them stop” requests for 70-80% of the viral unofficial missing persons crossing my feed.

This number is obviously anecdata–I’ve never been able to find a peer reviewed study attempting to pin down prevalance. But based on those experiences, I absolutely advise never sharing one of those posts.

(I used to finish this PSA thread saying that if a missing person alert came from police or a federal agency, it had likely been screened for abusive tactics and was more likely to be real. I no longer say this.)

This should be your principle for any time someone wants you to connect them with someone else, btw. Never give someone’s info to the person who asked. Tell the asker you’ll give that third party THEIR contact info instead.

–and if you do spot/know the person in them, tell THAT PERSON someone is looking for them instead of providing any information to the person doing the looking.

I will probably be muting this in a bit, but some followup: for those questioning “just how often does this happen, even?”, I wasn’t keeping an exact count but I think we just hit double digits of people saying “this happened to me/a friend” in replies to QTs of this

As in, of the current 70 or so quote tweets, around 10% of them have a person telling a story about a time their abuser faked a social media post expressing concern over them as a missing/vulnerable person in order to continue abusing them.

It’s not rare. It’s not unusual. It is, in fact, vastly more common than *any* dangerous situation in which social media attention can do literally anything to improve the situation. (I’ve rarely seen a dangerous situation massive social media attention can improve, honestly.)

To the people who want to argue about this advice: I have, more than once, personally seen an abuser’s viral missing persons post end in suicide or homicide. I have never in 20 years seen a case of stranger kidnapping at all, much less one that’s resolved by virality.

All I’m asking you to understand is that the abusers who do this are very, very good at convincing you their “missing person” is irrational, in danger, or has diminished capacity. You will never be able to spot these situations by reading over a single post. Ever.

If you want to retweet missing personsviral alerts because you want to do good in the world, please understand that there is a much, much greater statistical chance you are *actually* contributing to making things much worse for the person instead. Please just think about that.

And to answer the “well why are you qualified to say this”, since this has gotten way out of my usual circles: hi, I’ve been working trust and safety/ToS on social media for 20 years now. I am never, ever the person with the worst stories when I go out drinking with others.

/end id]

If you’re doubting this the thing you have to remember is that stranger kidnapping is very rare, for either children or adults. The vast majority of the time, when someone is kidnapped or held against their will, it’s by someone they already know, someone close to them: a parent, a partner, that sort of thing. So if someone has been kidnapped or whatever, the people closest to them (who are usually the ones to put up missing posters and whatnot) should be the first suspects, not the last. It’s possible that the person putting up the missing person fliers is the parent who has custody and the noncustodial parent kidnapped the kids … but it’s just as possible that the person putting up fliers is the noncustodial parent who is doing this as part of a plot to find the kids so they can kidnap them. You can’t tell which is which just from seeing the flyer.

And when people choose to leave voluntarily and cut all contact with people close to them, they don’t just do it on a whim. There’s pretty much always a reason. For example, the people they’re cutting contact with might be shitty and abusive. Now, the reason might also be “the person leaving is messed up by drugs” or whatnot, or “they’re being forced by an abuser to cut contact.” Those are also reasons. But a lot of people who cut contact with someone in their life do it for very good and valid reasons. You can’t tell which is which just from seeing the flyer.

rb this version with image descriptions please

remember this especially now with so many trans and gay people fleeing states that are passing anti lgbtq laws

i guarantee there’s going to be homophobic families saying their “mentally disturbed family member” is missing